Occupy! Let's just take a moment to ascertain the heart of the matter. What exactly is this Occupy grouping? Supposedly, the supporters are trying to show redress towards the Wall Street executives and their supposed corrupt dealings. Is this the true reason?

If asked, I am sure there are varying answers to this question. The liberal-biased media of the masses want us to think that this no more different than what they refer to as the “Tea-Bagger Affair”. This so-called comparison is, albeit more than a little off kilter.

Let us first take this matter apart by pointing out the differences. While the Tea Party rallies are geared towards a direct redress of the improper governance, by the elected bureaucracy. The Occupation crowd seems to lay premise that the full brunt of their problems are derived from that of these Wall Street executives. My question would have to be, “How have these executives caused the woes of these young fire brands?”

The Occupy crowd seems to be woeful in their beckoning of a pity party. From what I have seen and heard these crowds have done nothing more than wreak havoc upon the happenstance of the communities that have endured their cries of woe. Crime has endeavored even higher during their tenuous protests. The cry of rape, drug use, and even murder have shown they are there for mere show and have shown no responsibility for repairing their own mishaps. Seemingly they are all adults that could care less about the economy rather than their own well-being.

Tea Party rallies have had no intent of crime or indifference towards the class of any citizenry. In fact these rallies have amassed abundant crowds that are peaceful in their approach the governments over-encroachment of the constitutional authority. Not to mention they did not ask for pity. They have performed their duties in redressing their grievances, as is inherent in the First Amendment. Shall we venture to say there has been no need for the local police faculties to be installed to quell the rampage of the Tea Party rallies.

Why aren't these college students in class? Could it be that the tenured faculties of these universities have inspired the insolence and mentality of the “all for me” entitlement crowd? They cry of their lack of ability to find work, yet when asked what their degree or major is they say philosophy, or literature. Those are fine studies but where will they get you? They have been lied to, the truth distorted when they should have been told that their would be a lack of a need for such scholarly works in today's society.

Yes, I am calling out the liberal education system. The counsel should have been instilled in the students to the truth that there is no guarantee, no matter what the study. This has been an ongoing situation since the government has delved into our education system. For years, educated scholars have dealt with the faculties at hand, and done what they had to do. Yet, in the past these same scholars made their own way.

When viewing these rallies, the protesters are sparse and little more than a rabble. Yet, if you pay mind to the mass media, all that is heard is how effective and large these protests are. One only has to open their eyes to see that the liberal policy makers want us to see a crisis. The only way that these bureaucrats can show any sign of legitimacy is to show how responsive they are to the needs of their constituency. No matter the criminality the ends make.

Will the truth be reasoned upon the deaf ears of our great nation? Where are the defenders of the Constitution? Is there a way to educate these entitlement-biased crowds?

Occupy Wall Street and their subsequent following all seem to want an overcoming end to the executives and their corporate subsidiaries. The reason I mention this is all the technology seen when observing these same protesters. From computers, tablets, cellphones, and music players, all can be seen in use by the so-called entitled. Big news for the ill-informed, all of these items are derived from the works of these corporate executives. Let us break this down for the liberal, lackluster, ill-educated scholars. The computer you may be using is guess what, corporate manufactured. What about that cellphone that you call home for Mom and Dad to send you more money? And that iPod? Need I lend more in example?

That job you might have been looking for with that degree that your parents probably paid for, where was that coming from? More than likely, the corporation.

I am not rendering a defense of the big corporation, yet I do understand that my salary is paid by such. As are most everyday Americans. This even applies to the independent small business. For every aspect of the business and personal world relies somewhat on these corporate ventures. Today, we would find ourselves barren without such luxuries.

In this world we all have to deal the likes and dislikes of today's society. Yet there are many that believe that their likes are more important than your dislikes. All I can say is overcome.

With this being said, I would like a consensus on where the truth lies. Where should the blame lie? Is it Big Corporate, or Big Brother? Some of you will choose one over the other. As for me, the blame is squarely upon the shoulders of Big Brother. The government lays the groundwork for the regulations on the corporate world, and thus many restrictions. Some of these fall sharply upon the employees of such. These restrictions alter the feasibility of the corporation and its shareholders. In saying such, it must also be understood that the heads of these organizations are not without guilt. They will manipulate the system as much as the other guy.

It can easily be undertaken that a redress of government would inherently flow to the free flow of progress of the corporation and all of its dealings. Perhaps a closer look at the dealings of government might show proof that most if not all of the bureaucracy is hand in hand with these executives. In some cases, they will be found to be the executives of such. It is not the Democrat or the Republican, it is the “Duopoly”. You will find that the careered politician is one and the same as the corporate executive. So where should the blame be? I will leave that to you.

As for the Occupy crowd, go back to school and re-evaluate your educational outlook and alter as to fit for the ability to abstain from such fallacy, or the ability and willingness to ascertain change as your grandparents may have. That is if you don't like the system, then make the change. If you make that change, then you will need to be prepared to partake of the aforementioned fallout of such. It is not a crime groom change, yet there may just be an intent of criminal action if forced.

The easy answer to all I have stated is one question, “What would the Founding Fathers have done?”

In closing I would like to render my recurring statement that this is just One Man's Opinion! You don't have to, and probably won't agree with me. Yet that is the grand gesture our great nation.

“The people are the masters of Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!”--Abraham Lincoln        

Today Barack Obama beckoned congressional leaders to partake of his new bill. At a cost of $1.5 trillion in wanted tax increases. These increases would be part of his so-called deficit reduction package endured over a ten year period, to a total of $3 trillion. He bantered the use of veto authority to any deficit plan that would not raise taxes on the rich individual and the big corporation. He berated the “duopoly” with his agenda of spend what we don't have and stating his begrudged “...cut our way out”.

His over-rated agenda would be targeted towards the taxpayers in upper-tier incomes. Ten years being his infamous dialogue view of so-called savings, with the withdrawal of armed forces from foreign actions. His proposals conceive tax cuts and public works to create jobs along with the economy.

All the while, the GOP has iterated the idea against any tax increases. The administration's plan would call an end to prior tax cuts and deductions from the Bush administration. Obama referred to such tax cuts and deductions in his asking everyone to pay their fair share.

That is a fine question to ask from someone has partaken of the citizenry in his outlandish spending over abundant vacation sprees. All the while on the taxpayer dime.

He says all of this is not a measure of class warfare, but clearly of math. Not to mention his lamenting of not putting the burden upon his so-called version of ordinary Americans. What exactly is his version of what an ordinary American is?

So far, we have seen him do nothing but declare Tea Party members as unpatriotic and un-American. The last time I saw a Tea Party gathering, guess what I saw. That's right! Ordinary Americans.

Who did I not see? Well, let me see. How about Americans of all races and origins. Americans from all walks of life, and not to mention from different political backgrounds. Yet no unpatriotic and un-American activities.

I would venture to guess his idea of ordinary American would be the faithful blind follower with allegiance to his Marxist agenda.

Mr. Obama, you need to know that I am not one of those followers. I will question any and all of your agenda while you threaten my America. In fact let us all understand that one cannot be seen as an ordinary American when there is no such thing. By definition, ordinary is defined as the parts of a Mass that do not vary from day to day. Although you could classify the citizenry as a whole, as an original definition of a clergyman appointed to attend condemned criminals. So, Sir, if that is your defining of ordinary then we may just find in you and your cronies the vary defined criminals.

I am not quite sure of your prior stimulus package, but I can assuredly say that it stimulated nothing but that of disgruntled economy with no end to be seen in its demise. You, Sir have managed to collapse this Grand Republic and its economy in a mere two and a half years. That is a grand scheme to do in such short manner of time, since it only took us 221 years to build to what we were when you took seat in the people's office.

This man preaches sacrifice, yet where is his sacrifice? He has not rendered any such. He has, however rendered heartbreak upon the economy of this once-trending nation. When will the agony become us? His spending has to stop. We do however need to repair what has been broken. In order to do so we need to take the blame upon ourselves. The truth is We the people... are to blame. Once we have seen our blame we can see clear to repair the situation. The only way to fix that situation is to enact OUR constitutional right redress the government in all its actions. Question with authority, and question often. The election season is upon OUR America, and We the people...will have that redress in OUR vote.

In the end it needs to be known, the vote cannot be taken, only rendered to that what one allows it to be rendered.

The First Amendment has been rendered in these words I have written, and all can be seen these three words, “One Man's Opinion!”

Acting stupidly! That is what the Obama administration has proven quite consistently. I would venture to say that our fruitless President has proven this on his own. The liberal-left media tries to play up these misadventures, yet fail to spotlight any goodwill from this man-child's perspective.

His latest case for acting stupidly, has given arm to his narcissistic idealogue. He has the self-absorbed idea that he actually has a say in a sovereign nation's policies. Who the hell does this man think he is to set sanction on the foreign head of state in a sovereign nation. Three times in the recent past, he has given his highly unwanted, or needed advice to three of these sovereign nations. These three nations are Israel, Libya, and now Syria. Each and every time, this advice has gone to deaf ears. Thus rightly so, these heads of state have disregarded his self-anointed hand.

His own guidance of domestic policy has failed to stimulate anything but that of his crony union leagues. Sacrifice seems to be his call to action, yet not applying to himself. There is his mention of bipartisan talks and working together in sacrifice. This being said, he still has not applied this towards himself. In retrospect, where was his budget plan? He said he had one. If so, it was written in invisible ink and never read aloud.

The libbie-left agenda has no place for dissent. Our nation's founding Constitution has been shown that it has also no place in the liberal scheme for their ever-loved welfare state. The entitlement plan has a very prominent fixture in their version of a new America.

I have been affronted with accusations and slanderous finger-pointing. As I believe whole-heartedly in OUR Constitution, and find a unique and natural following of other defenders of this Grand Republic. There is no gain for an elected representative of the people to resort to childish tactics of name-calling. The man-child himself has resorted to such antics and defends his self-anointed edicts as right because of his citizen-appointed moniker of socialist.

He laid the groundwork in his actions. Thus, he has shown proof that his actions are that of a socialist agenda. Let me explain my theory. The Marxist-Leninist ideas of a single-party state creating a planned economy, with state owning the production. With this would be the mingling of a Maoist ideal of a market economy of cooperatives and state-owned production means into an exchange.

This can clearly be represented in the healthcare legislation of 2010. It laid groundwork for an exchange of healthcare through staged co-ops. The state-owned and run exchanges would venture into the realm of total government control over a very short time lapse. Call these exchanges what they are. That of being a socialized welfare state. Entitlements to those that the state decides deserves such care, and how they are represented in the exchanges.

These entitlements are all ill-fated in showing a lack of growth of our economy. Obama and his libbie-left cronies are assuring us the fate of the European model of misadventure. Even that of Canada, a socialized state with a mixed market economy remix of socialism. Entitlements are a detriment to our established nation of freedom. Let's do the math. We are paying taxes on a healthcare plan for several years before it is even engaged. Further job loss from the reduced measure of healthcare units and its suppliers. Not to mention the forced attrition of OUR rights and freedoms, granted thus in the Constitution.

The whole agenda of "tax to the max" and their version of the fair tax. How is it fair to pay fifty percent of everything made. That fifty percent doesn't even include that which the state and local establishment municipalities fare upon the individual. That means as much as seventy-five or eighty percent is to be paid out before the payer even lays sight sight upon the pay. Where is the incentive to show gain.

These individuals who have to pay such fares to a convening authority, are unfairly taxed upon. I am not a rich man, and hardly venture into the realm of middle class. Even I see the advantage of not taxing the wealthy out of such wealth. We have to set the story right. That person with the money is also behind the working and market class employment opportunities.

Well enough of the rant. The facts. Obama has a sore attitude towards OUR nation. He and his cronies are out to destroy OUR very founding. The race issue has abounded in an organized effort to allocate publicity away from the true reality of the harmful agenda of tyrannic scheme of the elected representatives. It is the duopoly and not a single party involved. It is not just the Democrat, but the Republican as well. The real culprit is the silent majority. We the people, are the silent majority. Being thus, we shall be heard.

We the people will stand strong in defense of OUR nation. As for myself, I am invoking my first amendment right to speak my mind. my opinion is just that, One Man's Opinion! In my voice I will represent those that can't or won't defend their own rights and freedoms to such.

Accountability and Responsibility is handed to all of us, and not just to those who are elected to represent us. The election process is just the beginning, and these representatives should be affronted and questioned with authority. We the People, are the authority. Let not a one approach upon this right. Take a moment and read the Constitution.

In closing I will ask that of us take a moment of our all-important time to read the first amendment. Just read one article a day from the Constitution. Start by reading this reciting of the First Amendment.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."    

The Obama Administration is leering towards the almost certain possibility of no second term. The economy has shown no viable improvement, while the administration continues to lament on such. While the GOP has yet to show any sign of a leading “go to” candidate.

There is a menagerie of candidates, yet not one stands alone as the name-maker. The nomination seekers are prominent in
notoriety. With the likes of Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Paul, Pawlenty, Johnson, and Cain the candidate field is most certain to attract a wider spectrum of contenders. Possible contenders are Palin, Bachmann, Huntsman, Bush, Perry, Giuliani, Christie, and Daniels. Some of these candidates have formally stated that they would not seek the nomination. We all know what a formal
statement means in politics, “Nothing”. Expect the surprise name-maker.

The real question should be, “Which GOP contender will stand the heat of the lurking naysayers?”

It must be stated that Obama can be defeated. His numbers are not where a sitting President should be. His economic policies
have not bode well within the domestic and international straits. Not to mention the Bin Laden poll-builder has dissipated to the null and void. It could even be his defense cuts (military cutbacks) will be a detriment to his future contention to that of a win in 2012.

It will assuredly draw down to the matter of contention within the GOP. Will these candidates draw against each other and
cause a split in the general election itself. The leading contender will assuredly have to decide the win on their own and not the matter being decided by the liberal media.

One of the biggest inhibitors of the GOP and other third-party candidates is the impression played out by the liberal-left
media. These candidates have to set the playing field in their own right and not allow for the selection to placed in the hand of such. A perfect example of the media playing a crucial part in selecting a beatable candidate for the GOP against a Democrat nominee, in the 2008 election cycle. Yes, I am saying that the media picked McCain because he could be easily defeated by the highly unknown Obama.

I am not taking away from the election of Obama, but the fact of the matter was that the opposition was nowhere to be seen. What do you think?

All I am trying to put forward is the idea of educating ourselves on the platform of each and every candidate. With this and
the access of public record, we can track and verify such contentions for ourselves. In this day and age of technology, there is no reason to be ignorant on the truth.

Now is the time to research these potential policy makers. Your understanding on these matters is of the utmost importance.
The elitists in politics are counting on the ignorant following to give their vote without question. Don't be a part of that following. It is your vote, and that vote is a choice. Regardless of what is said that a vote was stolen, that is total farce. Your vote is given, yet sometimes coerced using the ignorant factor.

When you step into that ballot box don't be caught off guard. Know the candidates and their policies along with their
background. If there is any doubt, question the matter.

As always, I am putting forth my own opinion and perspective. The First Amendment allows for such and I will stand firm in
defense of such for all to take effect of the same right.

Is there anyone in OUR nation's capitol city that has any sense whatsoever? I have to ask the question. The question has an answer, yet I will set upon my own opinion on the matter.

The Tea Party has again been affronted as that of attacking women's rights. If you would believe the word of one blogger, who seems to be ignorant of the truth yet passes her hypocrisy on to others as a self-vindicating guilt. Somehow she has taken a statement by Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, in his questioning of a ranking Energy Department staffer. If this blogger (Chelsea Hoffman) would have listened to the whole of the statement she might be able to undertake the meaning and leading process of such statement.


Her article lead with accusatory references as to the conservative, and how they attack the woman's womb by virtue of the right to purchase certain light bulbs. These references were to the White House administration and the respective departments of government in their over-reaching usurping the rights of the individual. The point Rand Paul was trying to make was clear and respective to those acting in total disregard to the Constitution.

Senator Paul also referenced his belief that low-flow toilets are a perfect example of forced conservation, vice that of voluntary conservation. Ms. Hoffman considers the rights of the individual as irrelevant. In her own ignorance, she has thrown her own banter of mundane crap in the idea of pushing her woman's womb diatribe.

I don't know about others, but I for one am not of the ilk to allow for such intrusion into my personal life. There is no choice, when it comes to the dealings of this administration. They deem themselves to be better suited to live your lives, rather than you, your own. Rand Paul was only reiterating the voice of this opinion. Yes, Ms. Hoffman, I said opinion. My opinion is just as important as yours is to you.

There is one difference in our opinions. I consider my opinion as just that an opinion, and you consider yours to be of fact. That is the great part about this great nation. We have that opinion by virtue of the founding of a free nation. Much to your dismay, we still have the right to argue our points. At least until your elitist administration dissolves the right of such.

As Ms. Hoffman generously attributed as ilk, there is every opportunity for her to prove her own ilk. It is highly doubted that she would want a truly defined descriptive of her woman's womb views. The truth will emerge, one way or the other. No matter the lie, there is always a ring of such truth.

This is not a matter of socialism, communism, or the incitement of fear. Nor is it a sway, as Ms. Hoffman calls it, to lure away from liberal agenda. She claims the hypocrisy in the conservative using their point, while she uses the same startegy to push her own agenda. This whole diatribe is not about flushing toilets, light bulbs, or the womb. It is by virtue of the founding belief of America, itself. The freedom of choice is their for all, and not distinguished upon any one topic.

In closing, I would just like to thank Ms. Hoffman in her use of selective hypocrisy. As such, I am gulity of my own hypocrisy, and that is my opinion. If any are interested in reading a single issue view of Ms. Hoffman, I am enclosing a link to her article: Chelsea Hoffman

“Choice by the people themselves is not generally distinguished for its wisdom.”--Thomas Jefferson

Sense and sensibility. There seems to be a lack of such in the minds of our elected representatives. At all levels of government, common sense is a rarely used characteristic in the same. The clamour to do the right thing always ends up the wrong answer.

Whether it be local, or at the national level, OUR elected ones act as they know better than that of the People. The talk of cutting the bidget always leads to more spending, while the call to the People always infers them giving up more of their livelihood. Why does it always mean OUR sacrifice and not theirs?

We are asked to subsist with less, while these same elected representatives draft upon that which is not theirs to draft. I know my sacrifice, as do you. Yet, I am unable to see their sacrifice. Have you seen it?

The next time we are asked to sacrifice, ask yourselves how this will effect their being. The truth be seen, We will be the sacrifice. Just ponder the un-named state legislature caucuses fleeing their duties and obligations, in a so-called cause of the People. This is not for the People, for if itwas they would stand and fight. It is merely a fear of not getting their way. Let this not be just a pointed direction towards Democrats, but to the whole of the "duopoly". The GOP is just as guilty as those that have fled their duties of such.

With that being said, let me move on to the lack of sense at the executive level of the national government. OUR lackluster President is now posturing the possibilities of alleviating the burdens of fuel costs by opening fuel reserves. WHAT? I thought he was hardset against such malfeasance. It must be pondered, could this be his ploy to set the stage for a re-election bid? That will soon be answered.

As for the President's further review, he has touched upon certain aspects that are noted now as failed campaign promises. Of these are the Guantanamo Bay detainees being tried by military courts. It was thought to be ended by now, yet the two-year ban seems to have been lifted and the continuance of such will be continued. This is a definite nod of failure on his part of allowing such TERRORISTS being tried as with the rights of the Citizens' court. Like it, or not it is a mass failure.

Not to mention, his lack of sense on the issue of forced purchase healthcare upon the citizenry. Although the court ruling against the hapless agenda, the POTUS continues his plight with disdain to the People's court. It brings to thought the acts of another Democrat President. That man would be Andrew Jackson and his rhetoric of, "...[Chief Justice] John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it." As with Obama, Jackson was setting plight upon a people, without due rule of law and accordance to the Constitution.

To further the disdain for OUR own domestic problems, the President is reportedly pondering the use of military force in foreign matters. This force being pondered for Libya. Why is it that this man and his cronies, as well as other members of the "duopoly" seem to care more for foreign matters than to the matter of domestic affairs. Where is the sense in that?

In answer to the above, I would like make it clear that We the People deserve and expect this sense and sensibility, not the lack of."

In closing I would like to quote Thomas Jefferson, "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent."

"REFORM, REFORM, REFORM!"

The people have spoken, yet the representative ears are void of any cognizant understanding. I was to the understanding that the mid-term election results were a reckoning voice. Tell that to the elected-to-be!

Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. The descriptive title is just that, a label. All are nothing more than that of "compromisors". They all use the plight of the citizen to endeavor their agendas. Their identities are ever-elusive to the truth. Some have even named themselves with monikers such as "No Labels", yet they are still using their duopoly monikers (Republican and Democrat).

Many of them even partook of the anti-establishment Tea Party, yet still kept their ever-beloved party affiliations. There is a misconception about the Tea party movement. It is not a political affiliation, but that of a united voice of the people. Party affiliation has nothing to do with this movement, yet the so-called conservative right have tried to take the credit for this movement. Let us not forget the liberal left, they are not innocent in this reasoning. They have tried to stifle the people's voice by touting seditious descriptives of the partakers of the Tea Party.

Yes, I said "SEDITIOUS"!

Now that I received a moment of your attention, I will explain. Some will say that I do not understand the meaning of sedition. The definition is merely an act against authority. Who is the true authority? If you have any understanding of the Constitution, or even the Declaration of Independence, then will know that it is clearly an undertaking of a standing of the people over that of a tyrannical point of power. To be more concise, "We the people..." are the true sovereign authority.

This being said, these elected representatives touting banters of racism, sexism, and the abundantly used anti-American rhetoric to disenfranchise the will of the people is sedition, in every facet of the sense. Many will say that this word is a descriptive of the government, and not that of the constituent. I challenge anyone to show where it says in the Constitution, that the true authority is inherent anywhere other than that of the people.

To those that lack the comrehension of this statement, I will quote from the Constitution itself. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Some might recognize this sentence. Well, we all should. It is the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. It is the first of ten amendments noted as the "Bill of Rights".

Interestingly, the title itself is an explanation all its own. The "BILL OF RIGHTS". If that is not reason enough to show "We the people..." as the defining authority of this grand republic. I challenge any who disagree, to educate me.

As I have stated in the past, I am not a legal scholar. With this being said, I am a citizen and sovereign in my right to redress my elected government. As you are as well, sovereign in your own right. The tyrannical bodies affronting the plight of the citizen don't want you to understand this.

It is OUR duty and responsibility to understand the Constitution, and all of its inherents. The inherent being the will of "We the people...".

This writing is an envoked right of my First Amendment rights of free speech. Not to memtion the right to redress any grievance, found to be questionable. This right is inherent with the action of opinion. That is just what it is, "My Opinion!"

Endorsement, that brings a quick smile to my face. The President seems to not understand that his endorsement means nothing. What could be worse for the nation of India, than this arrogant man to give his endorsement. We all saw what happened to his endorsements in the recent midterms. With his endorsement, he has unknowingly brought about the probable grumbling of an already uneasy China. How will China react to the matter of a permanent U. N Security Council seat?

The ever-growing economy of India assures a growth of influence on both trade and climate change. The latter being an Obama agenda. Just where is he going with this pushed influence. As if he actually has any world influence.

His fundamental change is "NOT" working at home, and he obnoxiously believes he can toss his version of fundamental upon the world. He has evidently ascended the clouds of his own footsteps, in believing he can teach his idea of democracy to that of the world's largest democracy, India. "Quick, someone grab him from that stairway to the clouds before he hurts his ego!"

President Obama is trying to teach accountability and responsibility to people of the world, and that is a subject he does not understand. So, he is in no position to suggest any fixes when he cannot even fix the problems in his electorate country. Ten days, will it be enough time to digest his lack of forthcoming in progressive reform.

What are the other security council members thinking about his endorsement? I can honestly say that the vote will not immediately be put to a vote. Stacking the courts and that of the U. N. will only lead to the One World agenda.

He believes that India offers benefits that can be enhanced by a multi-billion trade deal. Is this reassurance enough?

Obama has set the groundwork for what could be seen as a potential trade war between the markets of both India and China. Does anyone have to ask where this trade war would lead? It can only be a mere step towards derision.

The American entourage has an estimated compliment of security, aides, diplomats and business executives. I will not try to estimate the cost to the taxpayer, but will assume the cost is unwarranted. What does he think he is doing spending OUR dollars on nothing more than another vacation for the Obama household. All at the cost of stolen tax dollars.

During the ten day economic tour, he will most-assuredly attend the G20 summit. He will arrogantly push for protective measures against the deavaluing of world currencies. His arrogance shows through with this agenda being that he has a more pressing need at home to protect our dollar value. This being said, he should stop the printing press, and permanently extend the current tax cuts.

One thing can be assured, the new trade deal can only harm the United States. The President will relinquish our trade authority for that of the foreign market. Meaning, any restrictions would only hinder the domestic market while powering the international market.

So, the proof is in the tale. Obama has taken another bow!

As always, I am making statement of One Man's Opinion!

The fervor of the mid-term elections are behind us now. It would be thought that all is well. Not in the world of politics. The finger-pointing has only begun anew. The media is making light of the facts of the election results. They seem to undertake an inappropriate means of these results. How they ire the loss of their liberal majority.

Even the liberal should admit the loss is a statement of the people. Yet will they? That is an easy "No". The liberal elitist has begun the game of reasoning the cause of the people. "The people just didn't understand that the plan to straighten America's problems is a time consuming matter. For it was all the bad, big business, GOP fatcats that assured in the demise of the economy." That is what they want you to think. Well, maybe that was not said exactly, but is all as seems in the world of my opinion.

The first words from our ill-experienced president were that of a wish of compromise and renewal of his party's bipatisanship. Wow! Where was this compromise six months ago? I don't know what his idea of bipartisanship is, it doesn't sound good to me. His arrogance only assures of his true agenda. Whatever he might want us to believe, he is not a friend of the people. He said it himself. If you oppose him, you are therefore his enemy. We all know what this means.

Well, I know. Mr. president, you and your liberal, elitist cronies need to understand who the true authority is derived. That is, We the people. It does not matter whether you are citizen, or not. For you are the elected President. So act the part. That is if the teleprompter will allow for such. What am I saying? I forgot that our dear President is on a grand journey to procure the protection of the Asian markets. For he has shown such grand execution of saving our nation's economy, that I could see why he would be called upon to do the same for the rest of the world.

Let's face the reality of politics. He has lost face within his own party and not to mention that of the his citizen electors. He would rather spend our tax dollars on a ten day excursion than to face the American people. Has he finally shown to us, his ill-experience?  Of course not. He believes he has done no wrong, and the American people have no idea what he has done for them.

I have to ask, what has he done for us? Nothing! Well, he has caused for a loss of freedom of enterprise. He has also, all but nationalized a vast market share of the automotive and banking industry. He has pushed forward a mandated purchase program for our healthcare. He has denounced Americanism as racist, bigoted, and sexist. He has accosted the citizen with undue tactics of bypassing elected legislature with that of regulatory acts.

Well, I guess I was wrong in stating he has done nothing for the American people. He has. He has relegated the citizen-sovereign to that of a mere servant of the state. That is exactly why the Declaration of Independence was written in reference to the treatment by the tyrannical monarchy of Britain. If you don't believe this is true then just try reading this grand writing.

History is repeating itself and the results of this past midterm election is a new declaration. One can only see that he and his liberal agenda can  and will soon destroy OUR nation.

As always, I am setting my rights under First Amendment to affront my rights of  opinion. If this opinion offends you then by all means, let me know. It will most likely not change my thought, but it will be heard. As with mine, your opinion matters. Yet it may not matter to some, it is still your opinion. That is the beauty of America.

"REFORM,REFORM, REFORM!"

Random, I doubt that.

That is how the authorities are describing the barrage of rounds at the Pentagon today. Supposedly unknown suspects fired upon the military bureaucratic office building. The official report, as of this afternoon was that of a random event. There were no reports of injuries as two office windows were breached by encroaching rounds. No one was injured in the pre-dawn incident in which shots were fired into two windows at the sprawling Defense Department just across the Potomac River in suburban Virginia.

The DoD stated as there being an estimated shots fired in the predawn hours. The vast compound went immediately to lockdown status as a search of the perimeter lead to an unconfirmed conclusion.

After further investigation, bullets were found lodged in windows at various points in the government compound. The barrage did not penetrate, but lodged in the surrounding perimeter. The weapon, or weapons used are unknown at this point.

Possibilities linger in the thought that the shooting may be related to the earlier shooting at the National Museum in Virginia. The museum incident was believed to be done by a rifle as well, yet not confirmed. As with the current Pentagon incident, the shots are believed to have occured in the early morning hours.

The convergence of law enforcement officers (LEO) from all contingents of government participated in the lockdown and perimeter evidence sweep. A block of officers swept through a nearby grassy area searching for clues in the shooting.

Excuse my wry humor, but I have to say, "Is this another grassy knoll incident?"

Is it really possible that our government is so inept as to speculate as to the possible relation of the two incidents? The bureaucrats seem to lay the agenda that they are all aware of their surroundings, yet they cannot even secure the governmental centre of our government.

Now, I know that I will catch wrath for this statement. Come on, how could they not know more. I have been in these areas, and they are some of the most security sensitive locales in our nation. They won't even allow you to loiter long enough to take a picture without conveying the message of you being a security risk.

It all sounds like a lot of scatter to me. Yet that is my opinion.

I am not stirring a conspracy theory, but a lot less has brought more thoughts of such. "Citizen, beware!. The crisis moment could be upon us in this midterm election cycle. This crisis could be the series of events that could change the outcome of such elections." Well, that is for you to decide.

I find it very interesting that such activity has gone unhindered. The aspect that such activities is lackluster in the approach of our government-relayed impending terrorist activity alerts. Is it a ploy? Or could it be a test run for further terrorist acts. In all accords we need to be aware of our surroundings. When I say "we", I am relaying that as inferring to both citizen and government.

As always, I am drawing forth on my First Amendment right of free speech, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

One man's opinion! Fact, or fiction. It is his to make.

Yet even in the age of multimedia, there are those who believe all that is said towards them. This same individual wants to blame those elected for all that happens, or perhaps does not. The true blame can be squarely placed upon these misinformed voters. Yes, you. We, the citizen, are wholly responsible for the established usurpation of the Constitution, and the rights founded therein.

It can be easily seen how one might take our rights and privileges for granted. As I see it, in order to truly take advantage of something there has to be a founding understanding of such. It is a shame that most citizens are lacking in the foundational meaning of these privileges.

Election day is just around the bend, and your independence is at hand. The representative body-elect will set the motion of things to be. These motions will endeavor to set the key for future generations. Every vote, no matter how it is slated, will effect generations to come. So, that vote that you might slate should be in consideration of the future. Our children, and their children should be in thought while the vote is considered.

How will you vote? Or, even more important are you going to? Are you willing to lose one right or privilege for that of another? The individual that gets your vote might raise your taxes, or possibly lower the same. Are you going to vote for the incumbent that allowed for such atrocities against the nation's foundings? Or, will you elect a representative who will make the proper change. This change can only occur with the proper vote to bring about the rebirth of tradition. This tradition is the achievement of the American way.

There will be those that want you to believe that tradition is bad. Well, in some cases it might be. In general tradition is a good thing. Examples of this tradition might be the Pledge of Allegiance, or perhaps the religious freedoms of the founders. Now, let me set my explanation of the aforementioned freedoms. This nation was founded upon Christian ideals and the free will to ascertain these religious freedoms.

Yes, I am Christian. This does not mean that I have set judgement upon any other religion or denomination. It is just my not believing they might do. We are in a nation that has set upon an indifference to religion, and allows for the secure practice thereof.

One might ask what this has to do with the election. It's like this. The belief system of one might lead upon their decision on matters of political leanings. That is what America is all about, right. My beliefs lead my political decsions and so does does yours. It doesn't matter, as long as you vote for your beliefs, and not that of another.

It is your vote and that cannot be taken from you. After every election cycle you hear complaints of how they stole the election, or they took someones vote. The answer is, "NO". Your vote has to be given, and that is what you do.

The matter of elections is a personal and private matter. Your vote is yours to do with as you please. So, use it wisely and vote your needs and wants. There are lobbyists from far and wide that campaign for certain individuals, and they care not for others of different opinion. The only concern of any lobbyist is that within their voting district, and not from another. Your vote is for you, yours, and your community. As is easily understood, your vote matters not anywhere else but in that of your own district.

There is not a day that I am not approached by someone asking me of my opinion on a candidate from another state or district, and I have to say, "I don't care, though I do have opinion on matters relating to my views."

I am not uncaring or indifferent, I am just being sensible. It is my concern that I should be able to have a true representative of my beliefs and values. As you should as well. So vote your mind, it is your right and privilege. Don't let it go to waste.

Don't vote yes. Use the vote of "NO" to show your support. Slate against the anti-you vote. It is normal for a person to vote for one like themselves who might understand them and theirs.

Besides why would you vote for someone who has no idea of your plight. An example would be the attendance of a debate of vying candidates. As you observe the candidates, you might ask yourself of the attire in their dress. If you are wearing blue jeans and a t-shirt, why would you want that candidate telling you that he or she understands you when they are wearing a $10,000 suit. The same would be if you were wearing that $10, 000 suit, why would you expect the candidate wearing blue jeans and t-shirt to understand you.

Most of the time all the reasoning needed is to compare the candidate to yourself. What does that individual represent to you? Have they ever had to scrimp by, payday to payday. Or, perhaps the need to make payroll? The answer is for you to decide, and I am not going to tell you how to slate your vote. Just vote your conscience.

As you are waiting to cast the ballot ask yourself just one question. Are you one of the party? Or, are you a party of one? It is your decision, and your childrens' future. We cannot be afraid to say, "NO".

Thank you for allowing me to voice my concerns. Allowing for the defense of our rights and privileges I am closing with the moniker, "REFORM, REFORM, REFORM!"